POLICE Commissioner Erla Harewood-Christopher has instructed her senior superintendents to report any difficulties their offices face in completing the renewal of firearm user’s licences (FULs).

However, a request by the commissioner for the FUL records for attorney Nyree Alfonso and her husband Towfeek Ali, both of whom are directors of the Firearms Training Institute, has incensed the attorney who said she is “deeply troubled” by the order as it appears. She said, she and her client, her husband, were being targeted for questioning the FUL renewal process.

At the start of the year, the commissioner announced that all FUL holders had to renew their permits, including those who were issued FULs before 2004, when the Firearms Act was amended.

Alfonso challenged the process which, she maintained, introduced a new policy for those who had FULs before 2004. She called on the commissioner to hold her hand on the renewal policy.

On February 6, attorneys for the commissioner insisted she would not be retracting her position.

The commissioner’s attorneys rejected Alfonso’s interpretation of the law that FULs granted before 2004, remained valid and there was no need for them to submit a completed FUL form 1.

Allana Rivas, head of the police’s legal unit, said the CoP’s notices were nothing more than a reminder to all FUL holders that their FULs must be renewed. She also disagreed with Alfonso’s contention that the “new” process was unduly burdensome and akin to a fresh application for a FUL and was likely to “inevitably and deliberately create administrative chaos and unlawful delay.”

In her instruction to the senior superintendents of police, which Newsday obtained, Harewood-Christopher instructed them to provide reports detailing the difficulties faced by their offices which has prevented the completion of the FUL renewals.

The CoP’s instruction was dated February 14.

The senior officers were also instructed to identify the steps that were taken by their offices to receive and accept FUL applications and/or payment for renewal of licences after the proclamation of the amendment to the act in 2004; say if FUL holders, both before 2004 and after, submit applications for the renewal of their FULS or simply made payments; did FUL holders pay fees for renewals and did the police accept them.

On the latter question, the CoP also instructed her senior officers to say if the fees for renewals were made without applications being submitted; if there are records to identify the number of FUL holders who paid their fees, the period for which these fees were paid and accepted and if any of them were issued their FULs before 2004.

Harewood-Christopher also wants to know if renewed FULs were issued upon payment or if their holders kept their existing FULs; were receipts issued and if fees were paid for each FUL or each firearm listed on the permit.

These were questions asked by Alfonso in her letters to the commissioner. She also said many of her clients and other FUL holders have encountered difficulties in r