STATEMENTS made by a radio talk-show host about a High Court judge in January were “divisive and inciteful” and negatively portrayed or degraded the judge and the Judiciary, the Telecommunications Authority of TT (TATT) has advised.
TATT chief executive officer Cynthia Reddock-Downes wrote to Justice Frank Seepersad on May 8 on the authority’s findings to a complaint he made of the Juju Love programme broadcast on Trinibashment Ltd’s 91.9 FM on January 30, 2024.
Reddock-Downes also advised that TATT wrote to the radio station and told of the findings and that it had breached a condition of its concession by “allowing statements to be made about the judge and/or the Judiciary that can place the Judiciary into disrepute.
“They were further informed that such a breach and any other breaches will be considered in the upcoming renewal of their concession,” Reddock-Downes said.
A day after the statements were made, Seepersad wrote to the Law Association about the broadcast, which stemmed from Seepersad’s delivery of the libel judgment in favour of businessman Inshan Ishmael against veteran calypsonian Weston “Cro Cro” Rawlins.
In his letter, which Newsday has seen, Seepersad expressed concern that the statements made by the host and callers brought the administration of justice into disrepute.
“There is an obligation to protect the integrity of the Judiciary and by extension the administration of justice,” the judge reminded LATT.
He also expressed his concerns to Attorney General Reginald Armour, SC.
“Having carefully reviewed the broadcast, I am concerned that the editorial which the host delivered and the comments which were made throughout the broadcast may have impugned the integrity of the court and brought the Judiciary into disrepute.
“The comments appear to exceed the ambit of fair commentary and/or reasonable journalism and the intent may have been to scandalise the court,” Seepersad said in his letter, which called for a decision to be made in defence of the administration of justice.
“The Law Association of Trinidad and Tobago and the Attorney General both have an obligation to protect and preserve public confidence in the administration of justice and ill-advised attempts to scandalise the court should be swiftly addressed.”
In addition to his complaint to TATT and his correspondence to LATT and the AG, the judge sought protection from the Commissioner of Police.
“My security concerns are now heightened and I hold the view that I may be a hate crime target,” he said in a letter dated February 1.
“During the program, I was ridiculed and called a racist and numerous callers expressed very strong and hateful views primarily premised upon my ethnicity,” he said.
He further noted an emailed death threat he received in connection with the OAS arbitration matter made in December 2023 and his presiding over the EMBD cartel claim lawsuit against a former government minister and several contractors.
“I hold the view that my conduct of this EMBD case may also be weaponised.”
In June 20
