The flying visit last week of the US Speaker of the House of Representatives to Taiwan was an interesting move by the 82-year-old Democratic firebrand Nancy Pelosi. The hugely experienced lady of high politics probably feels that at her age she has won the right to call a spade a spade and deal with the consequences later. Others might not see it that way, but there is something to be said for it.
I woke to the news of her visit and China’s totally predictable reaction with a sense of dread. But if we think back to how China has shown its true intentions with regard to Hong Kong, there is no sense in not being factual about the Taiwan situation.
The terms "Chinese walls" and "Chinese whispers" are now not politically correct and that’s as it should be, not least since the current Chinese leadership does not believe in such approaches.
Xi Jinping is direct on all matters. His message is loud and clear: You mess with me and you will get in where it hurts most. And in Nancy Pelosi he has met his match.
My favourite US current affairs programme is CNN’s Fareed Zakaria, who recently interviewed the chairman of Taiwan’s world biggest semiconductor manufacturer, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), Mark Liu. The company is said to command over 56 per cent of the global market share of the semiconductor industry, which means all the big tech producers depend on TSMC’s microchips, including Apple and AMD. China, as the world’s largest semiconductor consumer of chips in unfinished products, also depends on TSMC.
Dr Liu, who met the House Speaker on her short visit, seemed to me to be living in a make-believe world in which Taiwan’s current balancing of its co-dependence with China could prevent Taiwan being taken by force and TSMC along with it.
[caption id="attachment_968592" align="alignnone" width="683"] -[/caption]
His theory is that China would understand that the very intricate and sophisticated chip business depends on trust and “real-time correction with the outside world” and that Taiwan’s most important company would be rendered “inoperable” if seized by Beijing. He argued that the industry is so important to Chinese manufacturing it is protected from threats. I have since learned that Taiwan, not just TSMC, sees its dominance of the microchip industry as a form of defence known as the “silicon shield.”
Well, that may well be an inadequate defence in the long run. For now, China is reportedly retaliating for the Pelosi visit by cutting sand exports to Taiwan – sand is essential to chipmaking – and military grandcharging.
When there is force, however, there is always room for error and events spiralling out of control. Japan has already called for a halt to the exercises in the seas around Taiwan that are encroaching upon Japanese maritime space.
Taiwan is an irritant to China. Understandably so, since the country stands in direct opposition to communist China, having been the place of refuge of the defeated anti-communists who fled to the island after WWII, and is regarded as a b
