THE EDITOR: The Secondary Entrance Assessment (SEA) has long been a cornerstone of the nation’s education system, determining which primary school students gain entry into the country’s most prestigious secondary schools.
However, this high-stakes examination has become a source of immense stress and family life disruption for children, parents, and educators alike. At just ten years old, children are thrust into an environment where their performance on a single exam is portrayed as a determinant of their entire future. This pressure is not only unfair, but also a reflection of systemic failures in our society.
The stress of the SEA exam is multifaceted. For children, it manifests as anxiety, sleepless nights, and a fear of failure that is disproportionate to their age. They are told, directly or indirectly, that if they do not perform well, their lives will be doomed – a heavy burden for a ten-year-old to carry.
For parents, the pressure is equally intense. Many sacrifice their time, finances, and emotional well-being to ensure their children attend extra lessons, purchase study material, and secure every possible advantage. The societal judgement of what constitutes a "good" or "prestigious" school exacerbates this pressure, creating a culture where academic success is narrowly defined by SEA results.
This system raises critical questions about its fairness and purpose. Why should a child’s future be determined by a single exam at such a young age? Why is there such a stark divide between "prestigious" schools and others, perpetuating inequality in education? And why, year after year, do we hear promises of transformation and reform from academic pundits and policymakers, yet see little meaningful change?
The current approach to the SEA exam reflects a broader societal failure. It prioritises rote memorisation and exam performance over holistic learning and the development of critical thinking, creativity, and emotional intelligence. Instead of nurturing well-rounded individuals, the system reduces children to mere statistics, judged by their ability to perform under extreme pressure.
This is not education; it is a survival mechanism that leaves little room for personal growth or exploration. Is this why our crime situation is so high? Are we reaping the harvest of those who didn’t make it?
A more equitable and compassionate approach would involve a shift toward holistic learning and merit-based grading systems that consider a child’s performance over time, rather than a single high-stakes exam.
Such a system would reduce the undue stress on children and parents, while also fostering a more inclusive and supportive educational environment. Transparency in grading and admissions processes would also be essential to ensure fairness and eliminate any perception of corruption or favouritism.
Moreover, society must re-evaluate its obsession with "prestigious" schools. Education is not a one-size-fits-all endeavour, and success cannot be measured solely by the name of the institution a child attend
