Jerome Teelucksingh
THIS YEAR is the 90th anniversary of the 1934 protests in TT, but many people, especially our students, are unaware of the fact that the uprisings of 1934, 1935 and 1937 are closely linked.
Every year in TT the June 1937 disturbances and the role of Tubal Uriah Butler are celebrated, but there is little or no mention of the 1934 protests.
What were the factors that triggered these protests?
The agitation of sugar workers in 1934 was part of the overall climate of protest by the working class in the colony during the Depression years. The agony of the Great Depression (1929-1930s) lingered on and added to the misery of the masses. Rampant poverty among labourers contributed to malnutrition, poor sanitation, illiteracy and unemployment. Housing provisions for workers in the oil and sugar industries were in a deplorable state.
From 1933-1935, unemployed Afro-Trinidadians in Port of Spain were mobilised in hunger marches under the leadership of Elma Francois, Jim Headley, Jim Barrette and Dudley Mahon of the National Unemployed Movement (NUM). The name of this group was later changed to the Negro Welfare Cultural and Social Association (NWCSA).
ON Bolland argued that the NUM played an instrumental role in mobilising workers and began 'a new, radical labour politics.' During 1934 the NUM played a role in spearheading and influencing demonstrations among discontented workers.
The NUM contacted the sugar workers and was informed by Poolbasie, an outspoken Indo-Trinidadian worker, of the problems facing the workers. These included high rents of barracks, high levels of unemployment, estate drivers who exploited young female sugar workers, increased tasks, and a drought which made the land unworkable.
The protest by 800 sugar workers on July 6, 1934, at Brechin Castle and Esperanza Estates, later joined by frustrated workers from the central and northern estates, set in motion a series of civil demonstrations.
The police sought to quell the outburst but were attacked. After the violence subsided, 12 people were arrested.
The domino effect was evident, as almost 15,000 sugar workers in Tunapuna, Chaguanas, Couva and San Fernando staged similar protests. Fortunately, nobody was killed, though many protesters were jailed or fined.
The spontaneity of the disturbances and the fact that no leaders emerged could be a reason why these working-class disturbances tend to be forgotten by the public.
The UWI's Bridget Brereton is accurate in describing the action of the sugar workers in 1934 as 'the politics of the streets' and 'a watershed in Indian participation in labour movements in Trinidad.'
This development in 1934 introduced a new factor in the challenge of the working class against capitalist domination. Although thwarted by police, the proposed hunger march of sugar workers on July 20, 1934, from Caroni to Port of Spain, planned to unite Indo-Trinidadian sugar workers and Afro-Trinidadian hunger marchers, of the NUM, in a massive city demonstration.
Although the ag
