DR GABRIELLE JAMELA HOSEIN

THERE ARE a number of observations to make about Amar Deobarran's gruesome murder of Omatie Deobarran on April 1.

The first is people's disbelief that a diligent teacher, 'upstanding citizen' and 'very educated' guy 'who loved his children' could also be abusive, repeatedly and lethally. It's important to know that men exactly like this can do exactly these things. The fact that it can be any man is what is meant by it being 'normalised.'

When people act so surprised it makes it less likely for women to break their silence about abuse by respectable men because it's so hard to be believed and because people choose sides based on what they know, their own interests and biases.

Yet, violence isn't meted out by some recognisable outcast or pathological exception, its perpetrated (like rape) by men who appear like any other. Recognising this, we can understand why all workplaces, religious spaces and communities have a responsibility to treat these issues of gender-based violence as if they are deep and real, however hidden, in their midst.

The second is the family's reported disbelief that Amar Deobarran could kill. Omatie Deobarran's family reportedly advised her to 'try and mend up things' despite the fact that Amar would 'pick up a cutlass and knock it right round the hammock' when she was in it.

At one point it seems that Omatie was to continue living on the same compound as a man who was recorded threatening to 'saw off' her neck. Newsday reported that Amar was planning to evict her from their home, and described him and his mother telling her to go. It is commonplace for men to threaten to kill their wives, girlfriends or ex-partners, and for families to tolerate and defend them. Indeed, threats are often trivialised by families and ignored as a crime by police.

As a society, there is also significant dysfunction in how we understand love, whether in relation to beating children or condoning controlling and violent behaviour. Newspaper headlines are often guilty of just such confusion, misrepresenting men's killing of women as acts of 'passion' or blaming women for not choosing their men wisely.

The Express represented Omatie's murder as linked to her filing for divorce, not Amar's infidelity and its consequences nor possibly his retaliation at custody arrangements resulting from his actions, and reinforced the message that women who decide to leave are the least safe because they 'trigger' men to kill.

Express's headline focused on Amar Deobarran's suicide. Omatie was merely described as 'wife.' Guardian ran a story on how 'Sir' changed after his father died of covid19, though problems clearly preceded that. No newspaper printed, 'Unfaithful husband kills woman, self,' which would shift our perception of an inexplicable act by a caring man who 'in a sudden twist' (to quote the Guardian) could kill a woman in front of their child.

Third, it is therefore also absolutely essential that we talk about how a parent that loves his children could murder in fro