The matter of concern is that the Observation Report has morphed into a document – sometimes consisting of several pages – where one party (APNU+AFC) gets free rein to have its observations and objections recorded in detail.
The most recent directions from Gecom, in relation to these allegations, is that, the Supervisor must only record on the Observation Report the serial numbers that are ticked, and not the total amount that was queried.
For example, in ballot box number 3329, the APNU+AFC agent objected to serial number 39 on the ground that the person is deceased.
If the Observation Report accurately reflected the nonsensical and preposterous allegations being made by APNU+AFC, the public would understand why this process is so slothful, and more importantly, they would understand that this is nothing more than a fishing expedition to try to discredit the elections.
The use of the Observation Report to further the sinister agenda of the APNU+AFC, and prejudice all of the other parties, is inherently unfair.
