A HIGH COURT judge has set aside the $850-million-plus arbitration award to Brazilian construction firm Construtora OAS SA over the Solomon Hochoy Highway extension project.
On Wednesday, Justice Frank Seepersad ruled in favour of an application of the National Infrastructure Development Company Ltd (Nidco).
“Having reviewed the evidence which was before the tribunal, this court is resolute in its view that no reasonable arbitrator cognisant of the law and seized of the evidence adduced could have arrived at the position reflected in the award.
“In the circumstances, this court, without fear or hesitation, must exercise its inherent jurisdiction and discharge its obligation to defend the rule of law and to protect the public interest.
“Consequently, the commercial decision reflected in the contract to have disputes determined by the arbitrator has to be overridden and the court must set aside the award as same was premised upon findings which were unsupportable on the evidence, inconsistent with the law and are decisions which no reasonable arbitrator could have arrived at,” he said in his decision.
The state-owned company contended that the award by the three arbitrators from the London Court of International Arbitration in April should be set aside, as the panel made numerous errors in assessing the case.
NIDCO’s lead counsel, Annalise Day, KC, had submitted that the panel failed to provide reasons why it ignored evidence which supported Nidco’s contentions.
OAS’s lawyer Rolston Nelson, SC, argued the court should not entertain the case owing to a clause in the contract between the parties which said they would resolve their disputes solely through the arbitration process.
NIDCO made it clear it was not seeking to appeal the award, but wanted it set aside and remitted to the tribunal.
In early 2011, OAS was awarded the contract for the project, which was then estimated to cost approximately $5.3 billion. After the contract was terminated, the project was put on hold before it eventually restarted.
In August last year, Nidco announced that the project was three-quarters complete. But several months later a segment of the highway at Mosquito Creek collapsed.
Delivering a decision on a partial final award on April 16, arbitrators John Fellas, Adam Constable, KC, and Andrew White, KC, upheld OAS’s arbitration claim against Nidco and ordered US$126.3 million in compensation.
In the 223-page ruling, the arbitration panel ruled that Nidco was wrong to have terminated the contract on the basis of the two main grounds it claimed.
In the arbitration proceedings, Nidco claimed Construtora OAS effectively abandoned the project in late 2015 after it slowed down work, dismissed most of its staff and became insolvent by letting debt accumulate to suppliers and contractors.
The company denied any wrongdoing, as it claimed that the issues raised by Nidco were due to the fact that Nidco failed to make a major interim payment under the contract.
It claimed that at the time of the termination, it had
